This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilize.

Kremlin

On Fri, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released an updated study on whether or non Russia was responsible for both hacking the Democratic National Committee and aiding in the distribution of the stolen material. The report pulls no punches and argues that, in both cases, the answer is an emphatic "yes." All of the various intelligence agencies of the Us are in understanding on this indicate.

Before we swoop into the meat of the study, we need to define some terms and clarify exactly what the study does and does not state. It has become common, in both media reports and every solar day conversation, for people to refer to these allegations as Russia "hacking the election." This is an extremely inaccurate mode to refer to both the events in question and the subsequent investigation of those events. There is no prove that Russia attempted to hack voting booths or change votes and the ODNI report released on Friday specifically states:

We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The United states Intelligence Customs is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not clarify US political processes or United states of america public stance.

This is an important distinction to draw, given the way partisan attitudes have colored perceptions on the reliability of the intelligence agencies' collective claims. The ODNI, CIA, FBI, and NSA take not assessed whether or not Russian federation'south actions impacted the upshot of the Us ballot. The post-obit terms are used and defined inside the ODNI report.

Loftier confidence: Judgments based on high-quality information from multiple sources. It does not mean that the authorities is absolutely and 100% certain of its conclusions.

Moderate confidence: Information is credibly sourced and plausible, only non of sufficient quality or corroborated sufficiently to warrant college classification. Based on the government's descriptions of these criteria, corroboration from multiple sources seems to exist a major component of how judgments are rated.

Low confidence: Either the data'southward plausibility or brownie are uncertain. It can too mean that the evidence is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to support strong conclusions. None of the assessments in the ODNI report are rated as low confidence.

Findings and evidence:

The report'due south primal judgments are as follows:

  • While Russia has attempted to undermine the US and other liberal democracies in the by, the events of 2016 represented "a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and telescopic of effort compared to previous operations."
  • These efforts were ordered by Putin himself and were carried out with the goal of undermining public faith in the US electoral process, to attack Clinton in item, and to back up the ballot of Moscow'southward preferred candidate, President-elect Trump. All of the intelligence agencies expressed high confidence in these judgments.
  • That Putin and the Russian regime aspired to help Trump and denigrate Clinton, and did so past publicly contrasting her unfavorably with him. The CIA and FBI have high confidence in this position, the NSA has moderate conviction.
  • That data gathered by Russian armed forces intelligence (GRU) was disseminated to the public via the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com (Guccifer 2.0 turned over documents to WikiLeaks). All of the US intelligence agencies have high confidence in this cess. Guccifer 2.0 fabricated conflicting statements and gave unlike explanations for his actions, and the U.s. suspects multiple individuals may have collectively operated the account.
  • That Russia gained access to "elements" of multiple US state and local electoral boards, but that none of these compromised elements were involved in vote tallying (this assessment appears to be solely from DHS and a confidence assessment is not given).
  • That Russia chose to leak fabric through WikiLeaks due to its "cocky-proclaimed reputation for authenticity." None of the WikiLeaks disclosures appear to accept been forgeries.
  • That the Kremlin's principle propaganda outlet (RT.com) has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks. RT has partnered with WikiLeaks in the by; Julian Assange has been interviewed past the editor of RT, and Russian media accept previously declared that RT.com was "the only Russian media company" to partner with WikiLeaks. RT's general coverage and treatment of Assange is described as "sympathetic."
  • That Russian federation nerveless information on some Republican-affiliated targets, but made no attempt to release this information or bear a comparable disclosure campaign.

The report describes Putin as personally motivated to show the US was interim hypocritically after the high-level leak of both the Panama Papers and the Olympic doping scandal, which Russia finally admitted to concluding month after years of challenge no doping scandal existed. Putin reportedly blames Clinton for protests against his regime in 2011 and Russia has previously suggested that the Euromaidan movement, which toppled the regime of pro-Russian President Yanukovych, was bankrolled by the United states.

The report goes on to item how the Russian government has made widespread utilize of troll accounts and waged PR campaigns confronting diverse foreign policies or governments, including its ain. The use of online influence campaigns is an issue we've touched on before — information technology'south a common technique of repressive governments around the world, and can range from seeding false stories on websites that effectively office as branches of Russian propaganda (RT.com is one prominent example of this) to posters on social media and websites who show upwards to claiming, belittle, and generally sow FUD on whatever given topic. These types of campaigns have been used by China and Russian federation in the past, and the idea that Russia would have deployed such resources in a loftier-stakes ballot isn't difficult to believe. In some cases, trolls accounts previously devoted to arguing in back up for Russian actions in the Ukraine suddenly switched gears and began advocating for a Trump presidency as early as December 2015.

In the by few weeks, the US intelligence community has claimed the attacks were organized and ordered past Putin specifically and that they were aimed at improving Trump'southward chances of winning the election. Both of these arguments are more specific than previous statements, which merely attested the hacks to Russia and noted they might accept been intended to sow anarchy more than generally.

A solid argument — but not objective proof

The problem with the ODNI'southward report is that it contains little in the way of difficult proof, even when combined with earlier findings from the DHS and FBI. Members of Congress, who take received their ain classified intelligence briefings, have signed on to the government's findings. President-elect Trump received his own conference, but has said comparatively little about it, in favor of blasting whoever leaked classified information to NBC.

TrumpTweet1

The government apparently has a substantial interest in protecting its sources and agents from potential exposure that could put them in serious jeopardy. Merely the ODNI report has been stripped of annihilation that could reasonably be described as proof. The 25-page report devotes approximately six pages to discussing how RT.com serves every bit a tool for distributing Russian propaganda and finer functions as the PR arm of the Russian government. Again, this is non new. When MH17 was shot down over Ukraine, the news media exterior of Russian federation covered the disaster for what it was — a group of Russian-backed Ukrainian militants used Russian hardware to destroy an unarmed civilian plane. Inside Russia, the incident was described as a deliberate assault either by Ukrainian forces or past terrorists attempting to arraign Russia (various conspiracy theories nearly a plane pre-loaded with corpses also fabricated the rounds). It seems likely that the reason the report dedicates such space to describing the cozy human relationship between RT and the Russian regime is because information technology'south some of the just information the ODNI felt information technology could include in its assessment. If yous aren't familiar with the means that Russian media often function as propaganda arms of the government information technology makes for interesting reading, but it's not proof of Russian involvement.

It is entirely possible that the FBI, CIA, DHS, NSA, and other intelligence agencies have slam-dunk proof of Russian involvement and that they accept provided this evidence in classified briefings to Congress. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, no friend to President Obama, has released his own statement, maxim "Russia has a runway tape of working against our interests, and they clearly tried to meddle in our political organisation. I strongly condemn any outside interference in our elections, which we must work to prevent moving forrard."

Meanwhile, NBC reported information from a senior intelligence official claiming that top Russian officials were jubilant Donald Trump'south win in the wake of the US election, also as challenge that the US government has identified the hackers who penetrated the DNC by proper noun. This anonymous source stated, "Highly classified intercepts illustrate Russian government planning and direction of a multifaceted campaign by Moscow to undermine the integrity of the American political system." Analysts who spoke to NBC described the classified version of the study as compelling to the bespeak of disarming anyone who saw the full array of prove, just this evidence has non been made bachelor to the American people. President-elect Trump has chosen for Congress to investigate how information was leaked to NBC (pictured above), merely has expressed no significant business organisation over the idea that Russia interfered with any facet of the United states of america' ballot.

Read bottom-to-top. President-elect Trump is incorrect according to this report; the GOP defenses were also penetrated but this data was not released as part of the Wikileaks dump.

Read bottom-to-top. President-elect Trump is incorrect according to this report; the GOP defenses were besides penetrated, just this data was not released as part of the WikiLeaks dump.

Trump's opinion has put him at odds with other congressional Republicans as well as Democrats. Undoubtedly he's wary virtually feeding whatever narrative that Russia might have had a hand in his election, but the attacks against the US' political system are significant plenty to deserve a bipartisan investigation. The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald has called for a bipartisan Congressional investigation into the hacks, in the hopes that Congress might release more than information to the public. Thus far, support for the intelligence agencies' conclusions has largely split up along partisan lines. This, in our opinion, is a fault. Tim Kaine's description of the congressional Watergate investigation at a hearing last week before the Senate Armed Services Commission is timely:

That small consequence lead to one of the near searching and momentous congressional inquiries in the history of this country. Information technology was not partisan. … Information technology was not an investigation because something affected the ballot. The 1972 presidential election was the most one-sided the modern era. Merely it was a high moment for Congress considering Congress in a bipartisan way stood for the principle that y'all couldn't take efforts to influence a presidential election and accept no outcome.

It is critically important that the security of our voting systems not become some other weapon in an increasingly partisan political environment.  The fact that every US intelligence agency is willing to sign on to this report with loftier conviction in most of its conclusions is pregnant. Information technology's also meaningful that multiple Congressional Republicans have voiced significant concerns following their own classified briefings. Information technology's not hard to believe that Putin, a former KGB agent who has openly called for Russian federation to increase its international influence, would orchestrate such a campaign. Simply as of this writing, nothing revealed by the regime rises to the level of formal proof, and the conclusions we've been given are vague plenty that this most recent document is unlikely to change many minds. Every bit The Intercept points out, a public bipartisan investigation that results in more data beingness released is important, both in terms of securing our voting system against external threats and for agreement how strange countries might attempt to interfere in future elections.